Also, an exceptionally over-it Sacha Baron Cohen plays a sentient clock, so that’s fun.Ĭons: Pretty much every other thing about this exhausting mistake of a movie is vexing. ![]() Pros: Director James Bobin’s “Alice Through the Looking Glass” - a follow-up to Tim Burton’s 2010 box office smash “Alice in Wonderland” - is very colorful. With editorial contributions by Kate Erbland. Like George enjoying a crunchy snack, it’s a textbook example of giving the metaphoric chip that forbidden double-dip.īroken down by pros and cons (with synopses omitted, since we know you know these movies), here are all 21 of Disney’s major live-action remakes and revivals ranked. ![]() But less understandable is the introduction of straight-to-streaming remakes, presented right alongside the original film - with both exclusive to Disney+. These contemporary remakes have been hugely successful at the box office, of course: a kind of tried-and-true cinematic daycare for parents looking to see something kid-friendly. By and large, Disney remakes are exhausting regurgitations that tend to undermine the joy of Disney’s most historically significant films. Plus, Craig Gillespie’s “Cruella” starring Emma Stone as the notorious dognapper is simply too entertaining to begrudge. There have been exceptions to the “Disney remakes are bad” rule: Kenneth Branagh’s “Cinderella” is an undeniably charming re-telling of the quintessential fairytale, while David Lowery’s “Pete’s Dragon” arguably surpasses the original. Up next, audiences will be asked to endure Disney rehashing “Bambi,” “Hercules,” “Snow White,” and even “Lilo and Stitch.” Robert Zemeckis delivered a Tom Hanks-starring “Pinocchio” last year, which IndieWire’s Christian Zilko called “barely a real film.” Kate Erbland enjoyed Rob Marshall’s upcoming “The Little Mermaid” starring Halle Bailey much better, but argued it tried too hard to be part of our world. In 2023, nearly every major animated Disney classic is accompanied by an overly expensive - wildly under-justified - successor sporting A-list actors and little else. ![]() The entertainment giant has spat out scads of these so-called “revivals” of its animated classics in recent years, with critics routinely pointing out the bottom line motivating the mostly mediocre trend.Īnd yet, no matter how poor the reception, the Disney live-action revisits just keep coming. If George Constanza was a real person - and the opinions of “Seinfeld” characters had any bearing on major movie slates - Disney CEO Bob Iger would be forced to answer in the affirmative some 20 times over thanks to his company’s buffet of CGI-laden remakes, sequels, and spin-offs. To quote one of the best sitcoms ever: “ Did you just double-dip that chip?”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |